e WHATEVER HAPPENED TO CORN FLAKES?

E Does blogging ruin a writer for real writing? Not that I am using myself as an example of the latter. The writer of LA has been known to construct pieces that actually take real time and thought as opposed to this amalgum. Will the satisfaction of writing with no effort transmogrify his writing with real effort into eternal bloginess. Will any other kind of writing exist in the near future? Will the satisfaction of not having a subject ruin him for traditional subject-based prose, which is what readers traditionally ( AT LEAST IN PRE-INTERNET TIMES) needed to keep from going mad--THE NOTION THAT A PERSON COULD WRITE SOMETHING MEANINGFUL TO A STRANGER. Who will the next vice presidential candidate be? THERE WAS A JOKE IN HERE BUT THE INTERRUPTIONS HAVE RUINED ITS LAME RHYTHM.LA has found that the single worst way to incite himself to writingness is to try. It must come from the aorta. It must come from knowing that it will take incredible effort and the result will be mediocre and no one will care. Whereas LA requires no effort, the result is abysmal and no one cares even less, or more, whichever. But LA does not care that no one cares. LA takes their lack of caring into account as he writes. If anyone truly cared, do you think he would publically humiliate himself this way? You don't know LA but I can tell you he's not that kind of guy. He's a caring person. He knows that this is a phase and if he treats himself with kindness and doesn't get too upset about it, it will pass, leaving his real writing where it was before he started this-- basically not very good but full of hope.